In 2019, we partnered with Bush Foundation on the Community Creativity Cohort 2, a program that worked with 40 community-based organizations across Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and the 23 Native Nations that share that geography.
Participating organizations were primarily led by Black, Indigenous, and people of color; many were centered in rural communities. They shared regionality but were diverse in size, mission, structure, audience, and the communities they served.
The purpose of bringing these incredible organizations together was to support them in making art and culture central to problem-solving. The program leveraged three strategies to support that work:
-
1
Grants
The 40 selected organizations received a $100,000 operating grant and the opportunity to access additional capacity-building and gathering funds.
-
2
Connectivity
The program convened participants to help build relationships and encourage collaboration.
-
3
Capacity Building
The program offered structured learning experiences, intended to be emergent and participant-led.
By the Numbers
The Community Creativity Cohort supported 40 organizations across the Bush Foundation’s geography of North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, and the 23 Native nations that share the same geography.
Explore Stories from the Cohort
Featuring
-
Julie Garreau
Cheyenne River Youth Project
-
Dr. Gene Gelgelu
African Economic Development Solutions
-
Buddy King
Higher Works Collaborative
-
Maggie Rousu
White Earth Land Recovery Project
-
Michael Hoyt
Pillsbury House + Theater
-
Stephanie Rogers
Anderson Center at TowerView
Lessons Learned and Unlearned
When Arts Midwest partnered with Bush Foundation to manage the operations of this Community Creativity Cohort, we were committed to trying new ways of working, to building relationships with new partners and advisors, and to centering the participants in the program.
Many of those things happened. But not perfectly, and not all the time.
Four months after the official handoff from Bush Foundation, we found ourselves in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our early plans for in-person gatherings shifted to virtual; travel among participants to each other’s communities was put on hold. We had staffing transitions, shifted plans mid-stream in response to evaluation and feedback, and extended our original timeline so we could gather folks in person and wrap up our work.
Our organizational values are equity, integrity, and learning. In the spirit of doing the work, holding ourselves accountable, and making space for growth, feedback, and brave conversations, here is what we learned along the way.
1. Collective leadership takes time and capacity
This program was at its best when it was being created and debated by its participants. But that model can take a toll on participants who are already at capacity.
From the start, the Community Creativity Cohort was intended to be participant-driven. Within this model, we knew:
- Capacity building, trainings, and workshops would be strongest when they were identified and initiated by the participants.
- Funding models and decisions would be more equitable when they came from the community.
- Retreats and networking would be most effective if participants were in the lead on setting the agenda and shaping the content.
In many ways, this model was successful – helping participants make new connections with each other, share perspectives, and deepen their experiences.
In their final report, our independent evaluators reflected, “Centering in what is useful and meaningful to people of color, Indigenous people, and rural communities was highlighted as the most important principle by those interviewed.”
But how do you balance the positives of co-creation with the reality of decision fatigue, overwork, and burnout?
The program intentionally selected 40 community-based organizations as participants. The four years of the program spanned the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and local and national calls for racial justice. The stakes, and community needs, were higher than ever for many of our partner organizations. This meant that even though participants were full of ideas and ambition, they were tight on time and resources.
We found ourselves asking: When do you set co-creation aside and make a plan, so others don’t have to? When are executive decisions helpful to keep the work moving and when are they detrimental to the outcome or the relationship? How do you facilitate a self-driven, de-centered program with a collective leadership model – while remaining accountable to your funder? How much should the latter even matter?
While we continue to believe in and lean towards co-creation, these kinds of questions continue to surface in our work and projects.
Paula Anderson, High School for Recording Arts, St. Paul, MN“The Community Creativity Cohort is the only forum where I didn’t feel like a square peg. It is also the only forum where I regularly heard Native voices, saw Native art, heard Native music, on Native land. The co-creative nature of the structure lent itself better to the artistic temperament than the other grant-funded organizations in which I have taken part. As we put our culture back together, the voices of [the cohort] are the type of voices that will lead a culture that is human, humane, and sustainable.”
2. It takes capacity to build capacity.
At the start of the program, there were funds set aside for each organization for capacity building, networking, or projects. But by summer of 2021 – three years into the four-year program — less than half of the funds had been requested and disbursed.
Many of the participants were deeply focused on how to respond to the varied needs of their communities. Understandably, though ironically, they didn’t have the capacity to pitch us on a project to build their capacity.
So, we pivoted our grantmaking. We worked with Bush Foundation to reimagine those funds and disbursed them as general operating support rather than project support (see #4 below for more on that work). We removed the application and panel process, and reflected on our role in perpetuating problematic systems — these organizations were already in the program; why would they need to reapply for the funds that were already earmarked for them?
We also pivoted our expectations around capacity building. Everyone was struggling with Zoom and webinar fatigue. Folks often lacked the time or energy to attend sessions, even those they had co-created.
We reconsidered how to measure success. And we continued to remind ourselves that the value often isn’t in the breadth of participants served, but the depth of the content – the sparks and ideas that are catalyzed in smaller, more intimate conversations.
3. Sometimes you need an incentive for self-care.
In Fall 2021, we held a series of check-ins with participants and one theme emerged: folks were burned out. Teams were stretched thin, programs were a complicated mix of online, hybrid, and in-person; and communities were needing more – not less – of our participants.
In response, we disbursed $750 to participating organizations. No strings attached, but we encouraged them to prioritize self-care, staff appreciation, and wellness.
We did not burden participants by asking for a report back on how they used the funds (truly, no strings attached), but we remained hopeful that it would help folks treat their teams; honor some unprecedented, hard years; and bring rest to the forefront.
As an intermediary, Arts Midwest doesn’t always have the power to decide how funds are disbursed or what they support. We were moved by the response, and are eager to find more ways to do this work.
Cohort Member“This is such wonderful news! How thoughtful and so VERY much needed. Our office greatly appreciates this opportunity to foster wellness and creativity in our workspace.”
4. There is no substitute for general operating funds.
If there’s one thing that the pandemic made clear – there is absolutely no substitute for general operating funds. Full stop.
As a grant-seeking organization, we have held that truth since long before the pandemic – all our nonprofit friends have. But as an intermediary – an organization that is often managing programs or disbursing grants on behalf of another funder – we don’t have the chance to give general operating funds as often as we’d like.
When we pivoted the program’s capacity building fund into general operating support, we leaned into trust – knowing that the participants knew where those funds were needed most. What we saw is that trust begets trust.
The Community Creativity Cohort participants were able to give those funds more freely to their teams, to projects that just needed some support to cross the finish line, and to artists in their communities.
— Sylvia Roy, Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe“The [CCC2] cohort allowed us to be artists without boundaries. Arts Midwest fueling into the cohort members the trust in artists and communities led me to treat the artists we worked with the same way. This cohort experience opened up my soul.”
Wrapping Up + Gratitude
The Community Creativity Cohort program was designed with relationship building in mind. It was structured to incentivize connectivity, peer-to-peer learning, and coalition building. To do that work across a group of 40 organizations took intentionality, communication, and organizing, transparency and trust.
We want to extend profound gratitude is extended to all involved – including the participant organizations, the Bush Foundation, evaluators, and the creative communities that served as the beating heart of this transformative journey.
Even as the curtain closes on this chapter of work, the vision behind the Community Creativity Cohort continues on. We are filled with appreciation for the power of creativity and its profound impact on community development and collective well-being. These lessons learned from the Cohort will continue to influence future work at Arts Midwest.
We encourage you to learn more about the Community Creativity Cohort by reading stories about several organizations, created in partnership with NewPublica.
Explore Stories from the Cohort
-
Not Just Any Kitchen: Sharing Knowledge at Sitting Bull Visitor Center
August 25, 2022
A space is truly of the community when it is shaped by the needs of the people it serves. The Sitting Bull Visitor Center in Fort Yates, North Dakota, the tribal headquarters of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, is recognizing and addressing its community’s need for holistic education around food sovereignty through their proposed Open Kitchen. This initiative complements their rich portfolio of offerings related to Indigenous knowledge and tradition.
-
Minnesota Transgender Health Coalition Proves Superheroes Do Exist
December 6, 2022
The MTHC has been at the forefront of trans healthcare in the Twin Cities for a long time. For many in the queer community, it is a place where they can “just be.”
-
Supporting Parents and Newcomers in Southern Minnesota
December 7, 2022
Care and community love are at the heart of Austin, Minnesota’s Parenting Resource Center (PRC), who continue to meet community needs through their recent merger with the Welcome Center.
-
New York Mills Cultural Center Casts Wider Artistic Net
December 7, 2022
Bringing arts and cultural enrichment to nearly 1,300 people living in their Minnesota town, the New York Mills Regional Cultural Center is a small organization with big goals.
-
The Matthews in Spearfish Embraces Change, Uplifts Creativity
November 21, 2022
The Matthews, originally known as Matthew’s Opera House, opened in 1906, just shy of 30 years after the Black Hills Gold Rush. The Matthews still stands in its original location on Main Street in Spearfish, South Dakota. Since its inception, the building has gone through various program changes to better serve its community.
-
Building a Home and a Community Through Theater
October 6, 2022
Pangea World Theater works hard year-round to create a space that connects people from all backgrounds and builds a covenant with the surrounding Lake Street community.
-
Cultivating Solidarity and Sustainability in Central Minnesota
September 21, 2022
Rural communities are often misunderstood and underserved. Organizations like the Region Five Development Commission (R5DC) exist to fill that gap and improve economic development in rural areas. Learn more about how this organization is co-developing strategies to improve quality of life for all residents in Central Minnesota.
-
In Smalltown Sisseton, Art is a Connector
July 20, 2022
Sisseton, South Dakota is a unique place. This rural town of 2,400 is located on the Lake Traverse Reservation: about half the town is Native American, and the other half is mostly white. But it is not only the residential makeup of the Sisseton that makes it unique. It is the survival and persistence of art in the area, and new movements that are bridging a historically separated community.